Monday, February 20, 2017
Governor Terry McAuliffe
House Bill 1582 reflects an incomplete understanding of weapons qualification practices within our military and is an unwarranted expansion in the number of people allowed to carry handguns in the Commonwealth. It would do nothing to protect the safety of our citizens.
It would allow any person 18 years of age or older and on active military duty or honorably discharged from the United States Armed Forces or the Virginia National Guard who has completed basic training to apply for a concealed handgun permit.
Contrary to the assumption of House Bill 1582, weapons familiarization training as a component of an individual’s military basic training does not qualify that
Monday, November 15, 2010
Attorney General opinion in a nutshell: DMV can choose not to giveth but they can’t taketh away. Press release:
RICHMOND (November 15, 2010) – Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli issued an official opinion Friday informing the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) that it is not required to accept federal work permit cards as proof of lawful presence in the United States for the purpose of issuing a driver’s license, permit, or special identification card. The Employment Authorization Document, also known as an “EAD” or a “work permit,” is for individuals who are temporarily in the United States and seeking employment.
The opinion was in response to a request from Virginia DMV Commissioner Richard Holcomb. Virginia law requires applicants for drivers’ licenses, permits, and ID cards to present documentation showing they are lawfully present in the United States. The law does not spell out which documents an applicant can rely upon to establish lawful presence. Therefore, the opinion concludes that the DMV has the authority and the discretion to decide which documents are appropriate.
With respect to the Employment Authorization Document, the opinion states that the commissioner was within his discretion to discontinue using it to establish lawful presence. As the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia concluded in a prior unrelated case – and the federal government also acknowledges – an EAD does not necessarily prove that a person is lawfully residing in the United States.
The opinion further concludes that the DMV is not authorized under Virginia law to cancel a driver’s license once a person has ceased to be lawfully present in the United States; for example, when a person is ordered deported or has been deported. A change in the law would be required to authorize the DMV to take the step of canceling a driver’s license in those situations.
The opinion can be found HERE.
Additional information DMV’s website is HERE.
Posted By Valerie Garner
Categories: Politics, State Politics
Tags: attorney_general, cuccinelli, law, study