Friday, December 14, 2012

Cuccinelli takes EPA to court for regulating water as pollutant

Cuccinelli says plan is illegal land takeover, would cost Virginia estimated $300 million plus

Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli

RICHMOND (December 14, 2012)-Today, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli argued in federal district court in Alexandria on behalf of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), and joined by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, against the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), seeking to block restrictions EPA intended to impose on the flow of water into the Accotink Creek watershed. These restrictions exceed the federal agency’s legal authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and divert public funds that could be spent more effectively on stream restoration for Accotink Creek and other waterways in the region.

“EPA literally is treating water itself-the very substance the Clean Water Act was created to protect-as a pollutant,” the attorney general noted. “EPA argued that Congress didn’t explicitly prohibit them from implementing these regulations, therefore allowing them to implement them at their own discretion. This mentality allows them to vastly and at their unlimited discretion expand their own power. Once again, the EPA has demonstrated massive regulatory overreach.

 “The imposed regulatory costs are estimated at $250 million to Fairfax County and $70 million to VDOT. Additionally, compliance with these regulations would be very difficult and would impact the communities that live near the watershed and the Beltway,” Cuccinelli said. “This is dangerous precedent for Virginia, as it could continue to happen in localities across the commonwealth at an enormous price tag to the state and its residents.”

The attorney general challenged a substantial expansion of EPA’s regulatory power. At issue is EPA’s departure from its CWA-authorized role of establishing Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements, which establish the maximum acceptable levels of “pollutant” that may be discharged on a daily basis into particular watersheds and yet achieve water quality standards, to EPA’s recently claimed authority to cap the quantity or flow of water itself into watersheds.

In 2011, EPA established a TMDL for Accotink Creek. Rather than establish a TMDL for a pollutant, such as sediment, however, EPA chose to issue a TMDL for a surrogate, the flow of water.

For more information on the original complaint, please click here.

Posted By Valerie Garner

Categories: Politics, State Politics

Tags: , , ,


No Comments

Comments are not moderated. Notify any abuse at put ABUSE in the subject and the offensive post.

Leave a Reply