House Bill 1582 reflects an incomplete understanding of weapons qualification practices within our military and is an unwarranted expansion in the number of people allowed to carry handguns in the Commonwealth. It would do nothing to protect the safety of our citizens.
It would allow any person 18 years of age or older and on active military duty or honorably discharged from the United States Armed Forces or the Virginia National Guard who has completed basic training to apply for a concealed handgun permit.
Contrary to the assumption of House Bill 1582, weapons familiarization training as a component of an individual’s military basic training does not qualify that
Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli in a Monday evening press release said that the federal government responded to Virginia’s lawsuit over the recently enacted federal health care law with a motion to dismiss the suit.
that as of matter of jurisdiction and procedure, Virginia has no right to bring this case now that Congress has the authority under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause to order Americans to buy health insurance that the health insurance mandate is lawful under the taxing power of Congress.
Cuccinelli said his office would respond by June 7. The government then has until June 22 to reply to Virginia’s response.
“The federal government is forcing citizens to buy health insurance, claiming it has the authority to do so because of its power to regulate interstate commerce via the Constitution’s Commerce Clause. We contend that if a person decides not to buy health insurance, that person – by definition – is not engaging in commerce, and should not be subject to a federal mandate,” said Cuccinelli.
Cuccinelli argued, “Just being alive is not interstate commerce. If it were, there would be no limit to the Commerce Clause and to Congress’s authority to regulate everything we do. If Congress has the power to force Americans to buy health insurance, then there’s nothing to stop Congress from forcing us to buy any product.”
In the press release Cuccinelli stated:
The U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause usually allows federal law to trump state law. But if a federal law is found unconstitutional while a conflicting state law is found constitutional, the state law will prevail.
Virginia has not joined other states and instead has chosen to defend a Virginia statute in a federal court in Virginia.
Cuccinelli claimed that other duties of the attorney general’s office would continue as normal as this case plays out.