Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Two percent meals tax passes with a call to rally behind restaurants

Latasha Suggs Co-President of Roanoke Education Association

Twelve speakers voiced their opinions at a public hearing on the two percent meals tax increase Monday in council chambers. They were evenly divided. Those opposed represented restaurants and those in favor were mostly educators.

The tax increase passed unanimously and cleared the way to trim the $8.8 million school budget shortfall by at least half for fiscal year 2011. The tax will sunset in 2013.

Latasha Suggs teacher and Co-President of the Roanoke Education Association said, “ it was unfortunate with this most recent budget our elected officials in Richmond have reneged on their promise to Virginia’s children.” Suggs urged continued patronage of the city’s restaurants.

Kerry McGraw, a second-grade teacher at Garden City Elementary School collected 600 signatures pledging to support Roanoke City businesses effected by the meals tax increase.

Thomas Becher, President of the Becher Agency spoke on behalf of the Hospitality Association. The association opposed the meals tax increase taking the position that it unfairly targets one industry. Earlier in an interview at a Chamber of Commerce lunch Becher was sympathetic saying, “all agree the schools need help but one industry caring the weight is a long-term mistake in strategy.”

Bechner could foresee groups opting for a more tax-friendly locale to hold their conventions. “When your talking about a 19% lodging and meals tax for a large group versus 11% at a place like The Homestead it makes it hard to compete,” said Bechner. He felt that even with a sunset clause once a group gets used to going somewhere else they would not return.

Bechner told council that association members represented 40% of the revenue generated from meals taxes. He asked them to not “cut off the hand that feeds you.”

Other restaurateurs opposing the tax increase ran along the same line. Mike Flannery of Flannery’s Irish Pub feared having to cut staff that included teachers who worked part-time during the summer months.

Tokyo Express restaurant owner Michael Jirousek said he’d move his business elsewhere. He said that the meals tax increase “tells companies not to come here.”

When it came time for council debate all were on the same page in recognizing how far the schools have progressed and not wanting them to backslide.

Councilman Dave Trinkle owner of two restaurants said, “personally I’d like to see a broader approach.” Restaurants are big employers and he worried about hurting labor. Trinkle questioned the sustainability. He asked what will happen when both the stimulus and the 2% meals tax expire – “What are we going to do then?” Trinkle added that there has been no synergy success in the Joint Services committee that would yield savings for the city and the schools.

Councilwoman Gwen Mason put city manager Chris Morrill only five weeks into the job on the spot. Mason asked for his opinion. Morrill said that in his past job working on economic development he realizes that “education is one of those foundational things.” The meals tax will buy some time.

To applause Morrill proclaimed that “the community has to absolutely rally around the restaurants.”

Posted By Valerie Garner

Categories: Business, Education, Politics, Roanoke City Politics

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (2)

jamie

April 7th, 2010 at 1:59 PM    


How did this all come about? I understand why restaurant owners wouldn’t like it, but localities in Virginia have almost no discretion on raising revenue.

This sounds like an excellent, well thought out plan and one that finds a creative solution to the crisis we’re in.

Wil

April 12th, 2010 at 8:13 AM    


I cannot believe that the council voted for the increase. We all know that whenever a tax is imposed, it will wind up staying. In two years, the school board will be complaining about something else. Teachers are no better than other workers. Many other people have lost their jobs or gotten their hours reduced. How about the restaurant workers who will have reduced hours or no hours? Shouldn’t they be able to provide for their kids?

Flannery should make sure that he lays off the teachers who work for him, since they are the reason for the tax.

As for me and my family, we will no longer eat in Roanoke City. We will go out of the city. I hate to hurt the restaurants, but I do not think that we should have to have the tax forced upon us.

Comments are not moderated. Notify any abuse at info@roanokefreepress.com put ABUSE in the subject and the offensive post.

Leave a Reply