Monday, September 21, 2009

Wagner says Lt. Governor Bolling will be a no-show at debate

Jody Wagner

Jody Wagner

Democratic candidate for Lt. Governor Jody Wagner said Sunday that incumbent Lt. Governor Bill Bolling would be a no-show for Thursday nights debate. The debate is one of five agreed to according to Elisabeth Pearson, Wagner’s campaign manager.

The debate is sponsored by the Prince William 100 and rules had been agreed to by both Bolling and Wagner. Pearson contends that Bolling wants the rules changed to include “no-use” meaning no web rebroadcast.

In a statement Wagner said that she, “believes each campaign should have the ability to rebroadcast the debate over the Internet so that more people have a chance to hear the exchange of ideas, just as the Attorney General’s debate was.”

Wagner still plans to attend with or without Bolling saying the rules had been agreed to months ago. She hopes Bolling’s threat to pullout will be reconsidered.

Posted By Valerie Garner

Categories: Election 2009, Politics, State Politics

Tags: , ,

Comments (3)

Matt Wells

September 21st, 2009 at 1:29 PM    

As usual, the Wagner campaign isn’t being honest and is attempting to twist the facts around.

Here’s what really happened:


RICHMOND – Matt Wells, Bolling campaign manager, today issued the following statement:

“Earlier today, the campaign of Jody Wagner released a statement asserting that Lieutenant Governor Bolling had threatened to “pull out” of a debate that had been scheduled for September 24th before the Prince William Committee of 100. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The Bolling campaign’s participation in this debate has always been predicated on our ability to develop mutually agreed-upon rules and debate format. However, and despite our best efforts, no final rules have been agreed to and for the Wagner campaign to claim otherwise is simply false.

During our discussions with the Prince William Committee of 100 we have made significant compromises on several issues, including the moderator of the debate, the rules of the debate, the format of the debate, etc. However, we have insisted on the inclusion of a “no use” agreement in the rules.

Unfortunately, and despite our best efforts, the Wagner campaign has refused to agree to a “no use” agreement, and the debate cannot proceed without such an agreement.

No use agreements are standard for debates of this nature. They protect both sides from having clips and portions of the debate taken out of context. For example, the recent gubernatorial debate in Fairfax operated under a mutually acceptable no-use agreement.

In addition, and at the request of the debate organizers, we have taken great care to keep our discussions about debate rules private and out of the media. Unfortunately, the Wagner campaign has refused to discuss the rules of this debate in good faith, as is evidenced by their recent press release; and has now issued a factually inaccurate and misleading statement in an effort to try and score some cheap political points in advance of the debate. Given these developments, it is clear that the debate cannot move forward as scheduled on September 24th and we have advised the debate organizers of that fact.

Lieutenant Governor Bolling was looking forward to the opportunity to debate Ms. Wagner and discuss the important issues currently facing Virginia, and we remain hopeful that this will occur at some point in the future.

We greatly appreciate the hard work that the Prince William Committee of 100 has put into this event, and we are very disappointed that the debate will not proceed as scheduled. However, it is obvious to that the Wagner campaign would rather debate about debates than actually hold one.”


Authorized and paid for by Bolling for Lieutenant Governor 09.

[…] Wagner says Lt. Governor Bolling will be a no-show at debate […]

[…] Related articles: Lt. Governor Bolling disputes Wagner’s claim of debate rules – Wagner says Lt. Governor Bolling will be a no-show at debate […]

Comments are not moderated. Notify any abuse at put ABUSE in the subject and the offensive post.

Leave a Reply